Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorA. Aguilar, Orlando
dc.contributor.authorMaghirang, Ronaldo
dc.contributor.authorL. Trabue, Steven
dc.contributor.authorE. Erickson, Larry
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-16T20:40:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-16T20:40:38Z
dc.date.available2018-03-16T20:40:38Z
dc.date.available2018-03-16T20:40:38Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-30
dc.date.issued2014-04-30
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40095-014-0103-7
dc.identifier.issn2008-9163
dc.identifier.urihttp://ridda2.utp.ac.pa/handle/123456789/4425
dc.identifier.urihttp://ridda2.utp.ac.pa/handle/123456789/4425
dc.descriptionThe effect of water application (e.g., through rainfall or sprinkler system) on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from pen surfaces of open-lot beef cattle feedlots was evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Soil/manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and were used as simulated pen surfaces. Three treatments (i.e., dry and loose, moist and loose, and moist and compacted pen surface conditions) were considered, simulating surface conditions in the field after a typical rainfall event or water application with a sprinkler system. Soil/manure and water were mixed within glass containers and analyzed for GHG emission using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer; emission rates were calculated from measured concentrations. GHG emissions from the dry soil/manure samples were low, with mean values of 0.02, 0.00, and 45 mg m−2 h−1 for N2O, CH4, and CO2, respectively, compared to moist soil/manure samples. Water application on the dry manure samples resulted in large peaks of GHG fluxes, with peak values of 99.2, 28.6, and 15,443 mg m−2 h−1 for N2O, CH4, and CO2, respectively.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe effect of water application (e.g., through rainfall or sprinkler system) on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from pen surfaces of open-lot beef cattle feedlots was evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Soil/manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and were used as simulated pen surfaces. Three treatments (i.e., dry and loose, moist and loose, and moist and compacted pen surface conditions) were considered, simulating surface conditions in the field after a typical rainfall event or water application with a sprinkler system. Soil/manure and water were mixed within glass containers and analyzed for GHG emission using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer; emission rates were calculated from measured concentrations. GHG emissions from the dry soil/manure samples were low, with mean values of 0.02, 0.00, and 45 mg m−2 h−1 for N2O, CH4, and CO2, respectively, compared to moist soil/manure samples. Water application on the dry manure samples resulted in large peaks of GHG fluxes, with peak values of 99.2, 28.6, and 15,443 mg m−2 h−1 for N2O, CH4, and CO2, respectively.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectFeedloten_US
dc.subjectSurface emissionen_US
dc.subjectSoil/manure drying processen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissionen_US
dc.subjectRainfall effecten_US
dc.subjectFeedlot
dc.subjectSurface emission
dc.subjectSoil/manure drying process
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emission
dc.subjectRainfall effect
dc.titleExperimental research on the effects of water application on greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlotsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record